Noura نورا

“أي صراع يحصل بين بين الشعب والسلطة ينتهي دائما بهزيمة الشعب ، السلطة في مصر ممكن تفشل في أي شئ إلا في إخضاع المصريين”
― علاء الأسواني, جمهورية كأن

“ليس من المهم فعليا أن تتزوج عن حب أو بشكل تقليدي.. المهم أن يكون هنالك حب بعد الزواج..وعلامة هذا الحب أن تكثر هذه المشاحنات في بدايات الزواج.. المشاكل ليست عكس الحب..

عكس الحب هو الإهمال”
― ديك الجن, مأمون القانوني

“If this constant sliding and hiding of meaning were true of conscious life, then we would of course never be able to speak coherently at all. If the whole of language were present to me when I spoke, then I would not be able to articulate anything at all. The ego, or consciousness, can therefore only work by repressing this turbulent activity, provisionally nailing down words on to meanings. Every now and then a word from the unconscious which I do not want insinuates itself into my discourse, and this is the famous Freudian slip of the tongue or parapraxis. But for Lacan all our discourse is in a sense a slip of the tongue: if the process of language is as slippery and ambiguous as he suggests, we can never mean precisely what we say and never say precisely what we mean. Meaning is always in some sense an approximation, a near-miss, a part-failure, mixing non-sense and non-communication into sense and dialogue.”
― Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction

“Language, the unconscious, the parents, the symbolic order: these terms in Lacan are not exactly synonymous, but they are intimately allied. They are sometimes spoken of by him as the ‘Other’ — as that which like language is always anterior to us and will always escape us, that which brought us into being as subjects in the first place but which always outruns our grasp. We have seen that for Lacan our unconscious desire is directed towards this Other, in the shape of some ultimately gratifying reality which we can never have; but it is also true for Lacan that our desire is in some way always received from the Other too. We desire what others — our parents, for instance — unconsciously desire for us; and desire can only happen because we are caught up in linguistic, sexual and social relations — the whole field of the ‘Other’ — which generate it.”
― Terry Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction