Status Updates From The Use of Knowledge in Soc...

There is something fundamentally wrong with an approach which habitually disregards an essential part of the phenomena with which we have to deal: the unavoidable imperfection of man's knowledge and the consequent need for a process by which knowledge is constantly communicated and acquired

Man has been able to develop that division of labor on which our civilization is based because he happened to stumble upon a method which made it possible. Had he not done so, he might still have developed some other, altogether different, type of civilization, something like the “state” of the termite ants, or some other altogether unimaginable type.

As Alfred Whitehead has said in another connection, “It is a profoundly erroneous truism, repeated by all copy-books and by eminent people when they are making speeches, that we should cultivate the habit of thinking what we are doing. The precise opposite is the case. Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking about them.

The problem is precisely how to extend the span of out utilization of resources beyond the span of the control of any one mind; and therefore, how to dispense with the need of conscious control, and how to provide inducements which will make the individuals do the desirable things without anyone having to tell them what to do.

the people guided by it usually do not know why they are made to do what they do. But those who clamor for “conscious direction”—and who cannot believe that anything which has evolved without design (and even without our understanding it) should solve problems which we should not be able to solve consciously should remember this:

I am convinced that if it were the result of deliberate human design, and if the people guided by the price changes understood that their decisions have significance far beyond their immediate aim, this mechanism would have been acclaimed as one of the greatest triumphs of the human mind. Its misfortune is the double one that it is not the product of human design and that..

I have deliberately used the word “marvel” to shock the reader out of the complacency with which we often take the working of this mechanism for granted.

Not all knowledge could be available to everyone, it is an illusion, "given" knowledge is an illusion...ok, now I understand where he comes from.

Valuing the real-life-stick-to-circumstance working and first-hand experience over theoretical abstract knowledge is very very very un-elite and a tip of the hat to the meritocratic system. Yet, it indeed can be an intellectual coverup for the status quo since those with unique knowledge/resources are not always a result of meritocracy and can also, even if they are, corrupt it by making their knowledge a privilege.

“Which of these systems is likely to be more efficient depends mainly on under which of them we can expect that fuller use will be made of the existing knowledge. And this, in turn, depends on whether we are more likely to succeed in putting at the disposal of a single central authority all the knowledge which ought to be used but which is initially dispersed among many different individuals” Kant'll be pleased.