Status Updates From Main Currents of Marxism: T...

The last few chapters have been abouth marxist authors one more crazy than the other. But Ernst Bloch takes the lead and I doubt someone can overtake him. He states that communism will not only provide all materialist desires of humanity, but also all religious, meaning once we have communism we will conquer death and... we will have a true God.
Yup...

Erich Fromm, your friendly Zen budhist Marxist.
The author praised him for his positive outlook and moralistic points.

So now we are talcking Frankfurt school. This guys are crazy. The author dedicates a section for Negative Dialectics, spares me the mental health to read it. This is clearly the ideology we call today woke, it is an anti intelectual hegelian religion.

The author shows how Lukas, Korsck and their pupils pot back Hegel in Marx, but also how they switched Marxism bac from scientific (Engle simplification) to anti intelectual. The current word to describe them is woke.

And we arrive at Gramsci. A infamous figure for many conservatives. I feel good reading about his work without reading his work. Yet I do not get it, why the modern left holds in such esteem individuals with such contradictory and inconsistent views. The guys ideas are clearly seductive and dangerous, but I am amazed how some people are not bothered by the contradictions, and superficial depth of his work.

Lenin walks and talks like The High Priest of Marxism.
Everything of his party is like The Church

Finnaly reached the Russian marxist scene

Just finished the Chapter on Sorel. I read his main book, Reflection on Violence, but to my shame I can not say I truly understood the guy.
I now see how he is the one who reformed marxism into proto fascism.

I guess any book on ideology must go through the clasics of that ideology. Here I am wondering. Should I read the chapter on this guy, and then ignore all of his books? Should I trust the author that he did a good job in distilling the content of all the books and life of a clasic into one Chapter ? To the clasics that I have read, I must say the author dose a good job, and sheds light that a casual read may miss.

Finished the first book, The Founders. The author is not harsh to Marx and Engles as I expected him to be He presented their worldview in the most complex yet easy to understand way I ever saw. Yet his critic of the Founders I feel lies in how vague and imprecise their ideas are at deep scrutiny This opens the door of multiple interpretations of their work in a manner that reminds me of religious writings.

Ah yes, ild Hegel.. telling us a confuzed concept in the most confuzed manner... and he is considered great for this...

The book finally arrived, and it is massive.
My wife asked me: Why do you need to know about this anyway. Seeing how many pages I have to read I also ask this myself.
Finished reading the 2004 preface; and this is the only author who understands that marxism was empty words in the easter bloc in its final decades for both elite and normal people. An observation that only people who lived in the eastern bloc can make

The book finally arrived, and it is massive.
My wife asked me: Why do you need to know about this anyway. Seeing how many pages I have to read I also ask this myself.
Finished reading the 2004 preface; and this is the only author who understands that marxism was empty words in the easter bloc in its final decades for both elite and normal people. An observation that only people who lived in the eastern bloc can make