Status Updates From Philosophy of Language

If I can't go 2 pages without finding something infuriating, not DNF-ing this book will be blatant stupid stubborness. The "a priori" knowledge in mathematics is the sum axioms. The sum of the angles in a triangle is a theorem, not an axiom, proven with the axiom of angles made by a line crossing two paralel lines. Yes, I know what you mean. However, that doesn't change the fact that you appear to lack seriousnes

As a rule, obsessive nitpicking people like me are often found among the higher IQ stratum inclined to read such a book. A book about linguistics shouldn't be so friggin' imprecise about language. Yes, you can't say "Sits." In English. What about Japanese, Chinese and Latin languages? Make an argument, will you, this is philosophy, not drunk cock-waving

As a rule, obsessive nitpicking people like me are often found among the higher IQ stratum inclined to read such a book. A book about linguistics shouldn't sayshpuldn't