Pavlo > Recent Status Updates

“By the following morning this, too, Sarah had accommodated. It was beginning to look like there was no end to her incompetence; that the whole world was involved in some complicated conspiracy aimed at destroying her self-respect. But when you started thinking that way, you ended up gibbering on the streets.”

Якби Раскольніков жив у перших десятиліттях XXI ст., у нього був би блог і, можливо, подкаст.

І він був би… переконаний, що він не інцел

“Yes yes yes, we’ll get the grammar police onto her first thing. Do they have actual powers of arrest, do you think? Or will they just hang her from the nearest participle?”

“Most people who’d shot to death a handcuffed man might have expected retribution. Luckily, Coe had done so at the fag-end of a series of events so painfully compromising to the intelligence services as a whole that—as Lamb had observed—it had put the “us” in “clusterfuck,” leaving Regent’s Park with little choice but to lay a huge carpet over everything and sweep Slough House under it.”

“‘Sleep’s overrated.’
‘Take it from me, it’s really not. Sometimes it’s the only thing that can get you out of bed in the morning. The knowledge that you can get back into it come night.’”

“Bad Sam eyed Ho with pity. ‘It’s Roderick, right?’
- ‘. . . Yes.’
- ‘Roderick, would you let me piss on you for a quid?’ he asked.
- ‘. . . No.’
- ‘So why’d you let him do it for free?’”

“When at last he emerged, tarred and feathered by sleep, the phone escaped his grasp like a sliver of soap…”

Despite the familiar questions, there are few topics more baffling than that of accounting for probability. A fundamental question is whether we talk about probability because it is an objective con- stituent of the world or only because we are ignorant of what is go- ing to happen. In other words, is the future intrinsically uncertain, or is uncertainty merely the product of our human limitations?

Russell and the early W. believed that everyday language obscures its underlying logical structure. "The King of France is bald" is a proposition whose logical structure is not immediately apparent on the surface. Language is a covering, like clothing to the body. A baggy jumper may disguise the shape inside. W. II did not take this view: he believed that language is in perfect working order— it hides nothing.

In 1936, Popper was present as a guest at a meeting of the Aristotelian Society where Russell was the speaker. He intervened, but the audience took his remarks as a joke, greeting them with laughter and clapping. 40 years later he wrote, ‘I wonder whether there was anybody there who suspected that not only did I seriously hold these views, but that, in due course, they would widely be regarded as commonplace.’

“Wittgenstein accused Carnap of plagiarism — a crime that he was always scenting and that he believed was actually com- pounded in this case by Carnap's acknowledgment in the book of the debt he owed Wittgenstein. Wittgenstein responded, "I don't mind a small boy's stealing my apples, but I do mind his saying that I gave them to him”