Micah Pierce’s Reviews > Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will > Status Update

I'm starting to see where Sapolsky is taking the novel. He is creating a basis for judging antisocial behaviors by looking extensively at a history of behaviors to evaluate intent, as opposed to evaluating intent within the confines of a certain incident. As the chapters proceed, his case for evaluating a longer history behaviors also grows. Some cool studies too, like how lying makes people want to clean themselves!

Sapolsky brings up a lot of cool studies that intrigue me about free will. I also admire his skeptical approach to the point he is trying to prove. He acknowledges the opposing side quite a bit, and, so far, attempts to slowly tear down this illusion.