Andrew Meredith’s Reviews > Delivered from the Elements of the World: Atonement, Justification, Mission > Status Update
1 like · Like flag
Andrew’s Previous Updates
Andrew Meredith
is on page 42 of 368
Chapter 2: The Physics of the Old Creation
— May 26, 2026 12:19PM
Andrew Meredith
is on page 239 of 368
In Chapter 7, Leithart (1) enters the pistis Christou debate on the side of subjective genitive, (2) enters the penal substitutionary debate on the affirmative side, and then (3) skillfully and imo convincingly brings the two together.
Jesus, the faithful High King (David’s greater Son) is the penal substitution for Israel, taking the wrath she deserves as her one-flesh Husband. His faithfulness unto death saves us.
— Aug 24, 2025 07:50AM
Jesus, the faithful High King (David’s greater Son) is the penal substitution for Israel, taking the wrath she deserves as her one-flesh Husband. His faithfulness unto death saves us.
Andrew Meredith
is on page 150 of 368
Leithart provides in chapter 4 one of the most useful systematic treatments on the biblical understanding of "flesh" I have ever encountered.
Too briefly put, "flesh" is (now) godless mortality driven by the fear of death into protectiveness, segregation, violence, and virility to both guard and extend itself.
Thus illuminating circumcision: the removal of flesh by the deliberate cutting of its most potent symbol.
— Aug 22, 2025 05:55AM
Too briefly put, "flesh" is (now) godless mortality driven by the fear of death into protectiveness, segregation, violence, and virility to both guard and extend itself.
Thus illuminating circumcision: the removal of flesh by the deliberate cutting of its most potent symbol.
Andrew Meredith
is on page 85 of 368
A successful theory of the atonement:
1. Historically plausible: a meaningful interpretation of all events
2. Inevitable: end of an obvious trajectory with strong explanatory power for what came before
3. Levitical: fulfillment of ritual, especially sacrifice
4. Evangelical: arises from within Gospels
5. Epistolary: makes sense of words, sentences, arguments in Apostles' letters
6. Fruitful: leads to church history
— Aug 20, 2025 06:39AM
1. Historically plausible: a meaningful interpretation of all events
2. Inevitable: end of an obvious trajectory with strong explanatory power for what came before
3. Levitical: fulfillment of ritual, especially sacrifice
4. Evangelical: arises from within Gospels
5. Epistolary: makes sense of words, sentences, arguments in Apostles' letters
6. Fruitful: leads to church history
Andrew Meredith
is on page 70 of 368
"The common contemporary rhetoric of conflicts between religion and politics obscures the reality. Conflicts are never between politics and religion. Conflicts are always between rivals that are both religious and both political."
— Aug 19, 2025 03:03PM



In Hebrew "ish" is fire and "ishsheh" is a burnt offering (a sacrifice), meanwhile "ish" (spelled differently in Hebrew but pronounced similarly) is a man and "ishshah" is a woman. There is an important divine marriage pun at play here.
The following is from a footnote that I found fascinating: "Prior to the appearance of the woman, the man is 'ādẫm, from the 'ādāmâ, the ground; with the presentation of the woman, he becomes ish. He begins as an earthen, unlit altar; but when the woman comes, he catches fire and speaks. Similarly, the arrival of the bride (Israel) "transforms" Yahweh. He has not been silent in Genesis, but nowhere do we hear anything like the discourses of Ex 25-40 and then nearly the whole of Leviticus. He is the divine Husband, whose tongue is loosed when he sees the Bride he has made for himself (see Zeph: 3:17) Yahweh himself becomes associated with ish (fire) only as the exodus approaches (Ex 3:2), as he leads Israel from Egypt (Ex 13:21-22; 14:24), at Sinai (Ex 19:18), in the finished bridal tent (Ex 40:38) and at the inauguration of the sacrificial system, when he breaks out in fire for the first time in the Bible to eat an 'isseh, bridal food (Lev 9:24). Not surprisingly, the first use of "jealousy" in connection with God is in Exodus (Ex 20:5; 34:14). Both of these are in connection with idolatry, adoring other gods. In Ex 20:5, Yahweh the Lover demands that his Bride devote themselves to him, not to an image; Ex 34:14 prohibits spiritual adultery or, as Yahweh calls it. 'harlotry' (v. 15). When 'ishsheh arrives, Yahweh reveals himself the divine archetype of the ish. For the first time, he is shown to be the consuming ish fired with jealous Passion for his beloved. Sacrifice provided way for bride Israel to approach Yahweh while remaining at a distance. It provided a way for the ravished divine Husband to "consume" his Bride in their marriage chamber."
The sacrificial system is, therefore, an ongoing wedding feast, presided over by the bridegroom priest (see Is 61:10-11).
In Exodus 34:7, nasa, often translated "forgives" means nothing of the sort. The text says that Yahweh "keeps hesed (covenant faithfulness) for thousands, who bears/carries (nasa) inquity, rebellion, and sin; yet He will not leave unpunished."
Israel, the nation of priests, bore the sins of the nations, the priests bore the sins of Israel (by consuming the sin offerings), the High Priest thus bore everyone's sins, and on the Day of Atonement (the Day of Coverings), he sprinkled the blood (which contained the life of the flesh, Lev 17:11) on the Ark of the Covenant, transferring it to Yahweh to carry, but not ultimately deal with it (yet).
"The Law is the sword that divides, and nothing but the Spirit can join together what the Law has torn asunder. The Law is spiritual, and only the spiritual can fulfill its righteous requirements. As long as Torah comes to those who are in the flesh, it can only kill. What is needed is something that can kill the flesh and raise up in the Spirit. What is needed is a form of sacrifice that does not rely on an animal substitute."
"Israel was chosen to bring blessing to the nations, but Israel turned the law into a symbol of national privilegea and boasting in flesh. Torah's purity rules were rules of access and welcome. Over time, Israel turned the good laws of purity into instruments to bar the way not only to Gentiles but also to other Jews. Jews came to regard impurity as even more virulently contagious than Torah says it is, and those who fail to follow the extended purity system of clean Jews are treated as outcasts. Purity laws, designed to provide access to God for people in the flesh, designed to regulate social connections within Israel, designed to prepare Israel for her mission to the nations, become instruments of exclusion and brute marginalization. At its worst, Pharisaical oral tradition is the law turned to flesh—turned into a means for reinforcing fleshly distinctions, restrictions and enhancing fleshly boasting--which is why Jesus so ferociously attacks the Pharisees."
Ultimately, the Law brought Israel under a curse. A curse that would wipe them away just as the flood did all flesh0 in the time of Noah.
"Only justification, whatever it is, however it is accomplished, can ensure the erection of a just society. The failure of Torah to create a just society is one dimension of the answer to our question, Cur Deus Homo? Who can save us from slavery to our own flesh? No law can do it, no matter how righteous. Only God can save."