Lit Reader’s Reviews > Mr. Darcy’s Fortunate Neighbor: A Pride and Prejudice Variation Romance > Status Update
Lit Reader
is 15% done
This story seriously doesn’t make any sense !!!
A rich London Lady leaves an “inheritance” to Elizabeth *very randomly*, but it’s not really an inheritance because the Lady is still alive (??), so while she has never meet Lizzy, she is giving away her home (in which she still lives in) to a random girl from Hertfordshire PLUS £15,000 per annum — right!
Sentences make no sense, many weird literary turns
— Jun 13, 2026 03:29PM
A rich London Lady leaves an “inheritance” to Elizabeth *very randomly*, but it’s not really an inheritance because the Lady is still alive (??), so while she has never meet Lizzy, she is giving away her home (in which she still lives in) to a random girl from Hertfordshire PLUS £15,000 per annum — right!
Sentences make no sense, many weird literary turns
4 likes · Like flag
Lit’s Previous Updates
Lit Reader
is 75% done
There is a big ball in London, one minute Elizabeth is a coveted heiress chased by every matchmaking mama with an eligible son, the next she is back to country nobody from Hertfordshire and “the ton” seems to know ALL about her wild walks about the countryside, her muddy hems, and her young sisters’ behavior (who are still back at home and haven’t met these people at all !)
— Jun 15, 2026 08:38AM
Lit Reader
is 48% done
This is one example of HOW this doesn’t make any sense !! Deep logical flaws that go against common sense [ red flag ] >>
“… the ton remembered what the ton had witnessed last winter: a tradesman’s son paying court at Netherfield, disappearing without explanation, his sisters calling nowhere near Gracechurch Street despite Jane’s visit, and now this same man reappearing at Jane’s elbow…”
— Jun 14, 2026 08:27AM
“… the ton remembered what the ton had witnessed last winter: a tradesman’s son paying court at Netherfield, disappearing without explanation, his sisters calling nowhere near Gracechurch Street despite Jane’s visit, and now this same man reappearing at Jane’s elbow…”
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Levi
(new)
Jun 14, 2026 01:29AM
I stopped reading this author. I think the works (bcs i can't call them books) are AI generated. To many books in short time.
reply
|
flag
This goes beyond everything any sensible reader has a right to expect. Whole portions of the structure & execution don’t make any sense !!! 😆
This author is not hiding her use of AI. She has even published a book on how to write fiction using AI. I think some readers are too quick to accuse authors of using AI, but this is a case where there is no question that the "author" is publishing AI generated books.
I agree ; sometimes the accusation is used like a witch-hunt, but clearly that’s not the case here (I went browsing the book list on AI by this author, as you mentioned, it’s super explicit and even boastful !)
It is a shame. I know the policy is don't ask. so as to not make a witch hunt, but it should also be disclose, disclose disclose!Even for AI-assist.
I have read commentary on social media by authors seeking “help” from an AI to edit or proof read their drafts, one was asking the AI to make it more sleek, for ex., cutting out repetitions or shortening paragraphs…— but that’s not what’s going on here ! Whole plot lines are being made up by AIs “who” don’t have a clue what’s going on with P&P, with Regency context, or even with basic geography, and so we end up with crazy nonsense like a line about “the ton” witnessing Bingley court Jane at Netherfield (what??), or a fake inheritance being granted to Lizzy by a senior lady who happens to be very much alive !
it's funny how authors thinks readers can not recognize AI. we read because of the emotional connection, the soul of the author is reflected in it. It' alive. Even if it's low ranking...When it's AI generated that feeling is gone. It's dry.


