Cyndi’s Reviews > Taffeta and Hotspur > Status Update
Cyndi
is 38% done
Wasn't Lady Jersey's mother-in-law the Prince Regents mistress? Not Lady Sara? And you're telling me 19 year old Taffy could go off BY HERSELF with Hotspur (oh the names!) in a carriage and no one cares? This book is ridiculous.
— Feb 18, 2013 05:47PM
Like flag
Cyndi’s Previous Updates
Cyndi
is 53% done
Chocolate cake?! Okay. I'm not an historian by any means, but I don't think chocolate was used in cakes until the 1890s. Before that it was used in drinks. This book is what gives well researched historical romances a bad name.
— Feb 19, 2013 05:43AM
Cyndi
is 52% done
I've counted at least 5 ways Taffeta should have been "ruined" by now and nothing! This is so dumb. Oh! And "tie"? Tie?!?! Has Ms. Conn not done ANY research? How the hell did this book get past a respectable editor? I'm glad it was free and I didn't pay money for this book.
— Feb 19, 2013 05:36AM
