63 books
—
37 voters
Ameya Warde
https://www.goodreads.com/ameya
to-read
(1473)
currently-reading (153)
read (966)
did-not-finish (0)
asian-fic (1)
history (213)
fic-ya-fantasy (75)
fic-fantasy (70)
fic-sci-fi (12)
nf-history-feminism (11)
tbr-politics (136)
litrpg (94)
currently-reading (153)
read (966)
did-not-finish (0)
asian-fic (1)
history (213)
fic-ya-fantasy (75)
fic-fantasy (70)
fic-sci-fi (12)
nf-history-feminism (11)
tbr-politics (136)
litrpg (94)
tbr-history
(78)
women-s-biographies (75)
kids-childhood-faves (70)
microhistories (62)
webtoon (62)
nf-poli-psych (60)
favorites (51)
kids-with-killian (51)
tbr-utopia (38)
biographies (37)
health-science (35)
home-grad-schooling (35)
women-s-biographies (75)
kids-childhood-faves (70)
microhistories (62)
webtoon (62)
nf-poli-psych (60)
favorites (51)
kids-with-killian (51)
tbr-utopia (38)
biographies (37)
health-science (35)
home-grad-schooling (35)
When we eat chewier, less processed foods, it takes us more energy to digest them, so the number of calories our body receives is less. You will get more energy from a slow-cooked apple puree than a crunchy raw apple, even if the calories
...more
“Since language is used for communicating thought, our view of language must also reflect our new understanding of the nature of thought. Language is at once a surface phenomenon and a source of power. It is a means of expressing, communicating, accessing, and even shaping thought. Words are defined relative to frames and conceptual metaphors.”
― The Political Mind: Why You Can't Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain
― The Political Mind: Why You Can't Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain
“That might be good news for rationalists—maybe we can think carefully whenever we believe it matters? Not quite. Tetlock found two very different kinds of careful reasoning. Exploratory thought is an “evenhanded consideration of alternative points of view.” Confirmatory thought is “a one-sided attempt to rationalize a particular point of view.”13 Accountability increases exploratory thought only when three conditions apply: (1) decision makers learn before forming any opinion that they will be accountable to an audience, (2) the audience’s views are unknown, and (3) they believe the audience is well informed and interested in accuracy.”
― The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion
― The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion
“Anyone who values truth should stop worshipping reason. We all need to take a cold hard look at the evidence and see reasoning for what it is. The French cognitive scientists Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber recently reviewed the vast research literature on motivated reasoning (in social psychology) and on the biases and errors of reasoning (in cognitive psychology). They concluded that most of the bizarre and depressing research findings make perfect sense once you see reasoning as having evolved not to help us find truth but to help us engage in arguments, persuasion, and manipulation in the context of discussions with other people. As”
― The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion
― The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion
“The brain is not neutral; it is not a general-purpose device. It comes with a structure, and our understanding of the world is limited to what our brains can make sense of. Some of our thought is literal- framing our experience directly. But much of it is metaphoric and symbolic, structuring our experience indirectly but no less powerfully. Some of our mechanisms of understanding are the same around the world. But many are not, not even in our own country and culture.
Our brains and minds work to impose a specific understanding on reality, and coming to grips with that can be scary, that not everyone understands reality in the same way. That fear has major political consequences. Since the brain mechanisms for understanding reality are mostly unconscious, and understanding of understanding itself becomes a political necessity.”
― The Political Mind: Why You Can't Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain
Our brains and minds work to impose a specific understanding on reality, and coming to grips with that can be scary, that not everyone understands reality in the same way. That fear has major political consequences. Since the brain mechanisms for understanding reality are mostly unconscious, and understanding of understanding itself becomes a political necessity.”
― The Political Mind: Why You Can't Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain
“Why didn't the Democrats accomplish more right after the 2006 elections that gave them control of Congress? It wasn't just that they didn't have votes to override a presidential veto or block a filibuster. They didn't use their mandate to substantially change how the public--and the media-- thought about issues. They just tried to be rational, to devise programs to fit people's interests and the polls. Because there was little understanding of the brain, there was no campaign to change brains. Indeed, the very idea of "changing brains" sounds a little sinister to progressives-- a kind of Frankenstein image comes to mind. It sounds Machiavellian to liberals, like what the Republicans do. But "changing minds" in any deep way always requires changing brains. Once you understand a bit more about how brains work, you will understand that politics is very much about changing brains-- and that it can be highly moral and not the least bit sinister or underhanded.”
― The Political Mind: Why You Can't Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain
― The Political Mind: Why You Can't Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain
##ta bookclub
— 11 members
— last activity Sep 04, 2014 04:25PM
Booklernin! We embiggen brain with book. Improve self. ##ta members only. No muahaha's allowed. ...more
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 329434 members
— last activity 5 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
LitRPG City
— 28 members
— last activity Nov 30, 2023 12:08PM
Group for readers of progression fantasy across Kindle Unlimited, Web Serial, Royalroad, and books!
LitRPG Forum
— 2064 members
— last activity Jun 17, 2026 02:33PM
Community for fans of LitRPG and the LitRPG Forum. 🎮 +📖 = 👍 If you want to hang out and chat with other LitRPG fans, be sure to check out our "Discor ...more
Ameya’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Ameya’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Ameya
Lists liked by Ameya






![투명한 동거 [Tumyeonghan Donggeo] 1-3 by 정서 투명한 동거 [Tumyeonghan Donggeo] 1-3 by 정서](https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1524744162l/36686792._SX50_.jpg)





























































